The first part of this series on the EU's Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) explored the covered types of artificial intelligence (AI) and the corresponding obligations of each AI actor. The second part of this series provided a brief explanation of the importance for providers to comprehend and adhere to their obligations. In the third installment, we examined these provider obligations within the broader context of the evolving AI landscape. In the fourth article of this series, Starr Drum, Shareholder at Polsinelli PC, compares the AI Act with the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) (AI RMF). Through an exploration of their distinct features and complementary aspects, this article provides essential insights for organizations navigating AI governance.

As the adoption of AI accelerates globally, regulatory and voluntary frameworks play a crucial role in ensuring responsible and trustworthy AI deployment. This comparative analysis of the EU's AI Act against the NIST's AI RMF sheds light on the similarities and differences between these two influential guideposts, providing insights for organizations navigating the complex landscape of AI governance.